Yesterday marked 6 years of filing Final Report of the "Commission of Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and throughout that period of time this report is over forgotten, even its supporters in the Peruvian blogosphere arguments have left their political or social sciences be applied as a Bible, but this time they have focused on identifying the "human factor", ie the victims but also deserves to do a mea culpa for the number of errors of the TRC was to produce its report.
In my opinion, one of its failures was its raison d'être . After the fall of the government of Alberto Fujimori, left caviar Peruvian conditions supported the transitional government of Valentin Paniagua in exchange for a commission of truth as in the cases of Argentina and South Africa where a report on abuses during the conflict between the state against terrorist groups Sendero Luminoso (SL ) and Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Amaru (MRTA). The problem is that after 6 years, SL is still operating in the valley of VRAE doing a kind of drug protection work while the MRTA continues to make a work of propaganda in various parts of the world for the release of its imprisoned members, ie terrorist activity continues to exist. In contrast, in the cases of Argentina and South Africa fees arose after finishing two terms as a whole disastrous in the history of the two countries: the Government of the Military Junta (1976-1983) and the Apartheid regime, that is its reason for being was a state policy that explicitly detrimental to the citizens of these countries were no longer applied when the commission began work.
Apart from these committees were created to review the performance of the state against the people of your nation, however the Peruvian TRC rather dedicated himself to find explanations, origin and consequences of the confrontation between two terrorist groups and the Peruvian government during the period 1980-2000 a problem that is still latent and may well be interpreted by many that its origin is a matter of "political vendetta" by the betrayal of Fujimori after the 1990 elections when away to the left of power.
In conclusion, this report was politically motivated revenge but a good intention as applied to a very different situation than what they usually were employed.